An ambulance backed into her vehicle — and she was the one left hurt

Our client was easing into a busy county rodeo event, surrounded by families, children, and horses, when — according to her account — an ambulance in front of her suddenly reversed and drove backward into her vehicle. She could not get out of the way without putting people behind her at risk. She was injured, her vehicle was totaled, and she has been left fighting for accountability.
What Happened

A vehicle in reverse — and nowhere safe to go.

In the spring of 2026, our client was driving to a county rodeo event where her son was competing. The grounds were full — families arriving, and children and horses crossing the entry area to reach the arena.

According to our client, she was turning in slowly behind an ambulance that had entered ahead of her. She says the ambulance, which was a good distance up the road, then put its vehicle in reverse and came back toward her at a high rate of speed, with no one directing it. She could not back up, she says, because a crossing where children and horses pass was directly behind her and she was afraid of hitting someone.

She says she laid on her horn, but the ambulance did not stop and struck her vehicle. According to her account, an off-duty firefighter had to pry her door open to get her out. She was injured in the collision, and her vehicle was later declared a total loss.

What We Found

A driver with nowhere to go — and an agency slow to take responsibility.

Every driver — including the operator of an emergency vehicle — has a duty to back up safely, to keep a proper lookout, and to avoid a collision that careful driving would prevent. Our client’s account is that the ambulance reversed at speed, without a spotter, into a vehicle that had no safe way to retreat. We are working to obtain the crash report, the agency’s internal records and any incident or investigation file, event security-camera footage, and statements from the witnesses our client has identified.

Claims involving a government entity follow special rules and deadlines in Texas, including formal notice requirements that must be met before suit. We are handling those requirements and pressing the responsible entity to respond, while our client continues to treat for her injuries. Our focus is on documenting fault from the records and the scene — not from any single conversation — so the claim rests on verifiable evidence.

What We Did

We are building the claim and holding the agency to account.

We represent the injured driver and are pursuing a personal-injury claim arising from the collision. Because the vehicle at fault was an emergency vehicle operated by a government entity, we are following the required pre-suit notice process and developing the evidence — the crash report, the agency’s records, the available footage, and witness accounts — needed to establish liability and the full extent of our client’s injuries and losses.

Our client did everything right — she slowed, she watched for the children and animals around her, and she warned the other driver. She should not be left carrying the cost of a collision she could not avoid. We intend to hold the responsible entity fully accountable.

Learn more about our car accident practice.

More Cases We've Handled

Related Case Results

Cases We've Handled

A young passenger riding in a Lyft was hurt when the rideshare driver caused a collision

Case Type: Rideshare / Passenger Injury Auto Collision (Car Accident Negligence)
Defendant: Lyft, Inc. and its driver
Outcome: Ongoing (in litigation)
Our client was a passenger in a Lyft when, according to the petition, the rideshare driver caused a collision. The petition alleges the driver failed to keep a proper lookout, drove too fast for the circumstances, failed to brake or yield, and lost control of the vehicle. As a passenger who had no control over the driving, our client was injured in the crash, with the vehicle’s airbags deploying. Our firm represents the injured passenger and has filed suit against the rideshare company and its driver in Harris County.
Cases We've Handled

A driver pulled out of a private drive without yielding and crashed into our client — who was left with a fractured clavicle and a neck fracture

Case Type: Failure-to-Yield / Intersection Auto Collision (Car Accident Negligence)
Defendant: Dustin Lemaire (at-fault driver) — Hardin County, TX
Outcome: Ongoing (in litigation)
Our client was driving on State Highway 105 when another driver pulled out of a private drive without yielding the right of way and crashed into her vehicle. The investigating officer found the other driver at fault and cited him for failing to yield the right of way. Our client was taken from the scene by EMS and treated for a fractured left clavicle and a cervical (neck) fracture, ultimately requiring surgery. Our firm represents her and is pursuing the at-fault driver and his insurer.
Cases We've Handled

A cosmetic chemical peel left our client with severe facial burns and permanent scarring — and, according to the demand, no informed consent was ever obtained

Case Type: Medical Malpractice — Cosmetic Procedure / Informed-Consent & Burn Injury
Defendant: Benjamin Beckert, M.D., and Beaumont Plastic Surgery Associates — Beaumont
Outcome: Ongoing (pre-suit)
Our client went to a Beaumont physician for a cosmetic chemical peel and came away with severe facial burns. According to the demand letter, the doctor applied a strong (40%) chemical peel for an extended time without ever obtaining informed consent, securing a signed disclosure, or conducting a proper consultation about her skin type and the risks. She has been left with permanent scarring, discoloration, and disfigurement and has had to seek treatment from other physicians. Our firm represents her and has sent a formal demand to the physician, with suit anticipated.
100% Free Case Evaluation

Were you hurt in a crash with a government or emergency vehicle?

Free consultation. No fee unless we win.